Jury finds Meta and Google negligent in landmark social media addiction trial

Just one day after Meta lost a similar child safety lawsuit in New Mexico, a Los Angeles jury handed the social media giant, along with Google, another defeat. In a case arguing that social media platforms played a major role in harming a young woman’s mental health, the jurors sided with the plaintiff, known by her initials, K.G.M., or her first name, Kaley.

The decision means Meta and Google must pay three million dollars in compensatory damages, with Meta responsible for seventy percent of that cost. More damages may be awarded as the jury continues its deliberations.

This landmark case, held in Los Angeles County Superior Court, aimed to hold the social media platforms accountable for harms caused specifically by Instagram and YouTube. Kaley, who is now twenty years old, stated these platforms contributed to her anxiety, depression, body dysmorphia, and other conditions during her youth. Lawyers for Meta argued that other factors, such as Kaley’s disruptive home life and her parents’ divorce, were more to blame for her mental health struggles than its apps.

However, evidence presented at trial swayed the jury to the plaintiff’s side. It demonstrated that Meta understood how addictive its platforms could be for teens and that it was actively researching the issue, using its findings to increase engagement among young users.

In the days before this case went to trial, both TikTok and Snap, which were also being sued, settled with the plaintiff.

This ruling, along with others like Tuesday’s ruling in New Mexico, may establish a precedent that social media firms are responsible for the harms their platforms cause. This responsibility could stem from a lack of safety measures or from algorithmic recommendations. That precedent could open the door to a new wave of lawsuits as other plaintiffs attempt to sue for damages.

Neither verdict is likely to be the final word. Both Google and Meta are expected to appeal. Meta has already signaled its intentions, with a company spokesperson stating it disputes the outcome and is weighing its options.